Even though
Fire companies and hot shot teams from all over the country came to
From the beginning and then all summer long as the various agencies, the public and even Congress engaged in heated discussions of the correct management for the fires. Meanwhile, the Park continued to burn. As dark smoke curled over the geysers at
In 1988, wilderness fire was still a ‘hot topic’ among wilderness management specialists, some advocating allowing natural fires to burn while most urged immediate fire suppression before fire could spread. There were valid concerns for the wildlife, the sacred bison, elk, moose and bear of
Both sides were right and both sides were wrong. Neither National Forest nor National Park Rangers had any clue that Mother Nature would push the
As the firelines moved fluidly through the Park and the political battle lines were drawn, Superintendent Bardee kept the Park open, a decision with which the media, most of Congress and much of the public disagreed. Fire up this close was rarely available to the public and despite public outcry, many visitors thronged the Park to watch the Jewel of the Crown burn. The Superintendent’s motivation was to allow visitors to see Mother Nature doing what Mother Nature has been doing since before we puny humans had learned to walk erect – replenish the ecosystem by fire. And, perhaps, during an administration that was not generous to the National Park system, to provide the public an opportunity to see how stretched the Park System’s resources have become.
I’ve thought a lot about the wisdom of keeping the Park open during the fires. In my view, one of the greatest missions of the National Parks is to teach us how to live with Mother Nature. Mother Nature is not always soft cuddly fawns, stunning sunsets and beautiful waterfalls. Natural disasters are only ‘disasters’ because we humans choose to name them so. Often the ‘disaster’ is of our own making – building houses in river bottom flood plains and in mountain forests. We dam rivers for recreation, power and ‘flood control’ and then watch our once rich soil lose its nutrients. I think the Superintendent made a really good decision in letting us see Mother Nature’s less gentle side. I wish I had been here to see it, too.
But fire does leave its legacy in more ways than rejuvenation. Twenty years after the fires of 1988, taking a break from walking around Artist Paintpots, I struck up a conversation with a Ranger. I noticed he was becoming more agitated as clouds in the western sky began to build into dark storm clouds. I finally asked him if something was wrong. The Ranger looked over at the darkening skies and told me he had seen clouds very similar to these in the fire of 1988. He still had moments of panic and Post Traumatic Stress when clouds gathered in a certain way on the horizon.
The fires of 1988 changed everything - the landscape, the people, the plant life and even the wildlife. Certainly, the disjointed handling of the fire in and out of the Park resulted in much better and more coordinated fire management. It seems fact that the fires are largely responsible for the rebirth of
It is fact that fire, no matter how scary it is, replenishes. Anyone who has seen the increase in wildflowers on the forest floor after a fire can attest to that. Some felt the fires of 1988 would be the death of the world’s first National Park. Others now claim the fires have caused
This blog reminds me of the 2004 fire season here. And you're right, Mother Nature knows what she is doing. The landscape after a fire season is a little sad but strangely beautiful. And the seasons that follow are breath taking. I was reading this a few weeks ago. Page 45 talks about your fire. Interesting!
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Alaska_fire_season
While the fires ravage much, I think of the lava flows of places like Hawaii - and what comes back afterwards. The Mt St Helen's type devastation is greater than the fires, as it seems to take nature longer to rid itself of the "dust" - choking out life. But I remember NatGeo type shows that used to talk about control fires and wildfires as certainly not desired, but the good effects that come from it.
ReplyDeleteGreat read Beth. We were there a year after the big fire. It was sad and beautiful at the same time... I need to get back there again soon.
ReplyDelete